What Are the 3 Types of Mediation?
Mediation is an increasingly popular method for resolving disputes outside of traditional courtroom litigation. It offers parties a chance to communicate, negotiate, and reach a mutually acceptable agreement with the help of a neutral third party known as a mediator. However, mediation is not a one-size-fits-all process. There are three primary types of mediation — facilitative, evaluative, and transformative — each with its own unique approach, goals, and mediator roles. Understanding these types can help parties choose the right style of mediation for their particular conflict.
1. Facilitative Mediation
Facilitative mediation is often considered the classic or traditional form of mediation. It focuses on guiding the parties through a structured negotiation process without the mediator offering opinions or judgments about the merits of the case.
How Facilitative Mediation Works:
In facilitative mediation, the mediator acts as a neutral facilitator who helps the parties communicate effectively. The mediator encourages open dialogue, clarifies issues, and assists the parties in identifying their underlying interests and needs. Instead of telling the parties what to do, the mediator asks questions, summarizes points, and helps the parties brainstorm solutions.
Key Characteristics:
-
Mediator’s Role: The mediator remains neutral and does not provide legal advice or opinions on the case’s merits.
-
Focus: Empowering the parties to find their own solutions based on their interests and priorities.
-
Process: Highly collaborative and party-driven, with the mediator facilitating but not directing the outcome.
-
Suitability: Works well when parties want to preserve relationships, such as in family disputes, business partnerships, or community conflicts. It’s also effective when creative, flexible solutions are needed.
Benefits:
Facilitative mediation promotes understanding and cooperation, often leading to agreements that satisfy both parties’ core interests. Because the parties control the outcome, they are typically more committed to upholding the agreement.
2. Evaluative Mediation
Evaluative mediation takes a more directive approach. Here, the mediator plays an active role in assessing the strengths and weaknesses of each party’s position and may offer opinions, predictions, or recommendations about the likely outcome if the dispute were to go to court.
How Evaluative Mediation Works:
The mediator, often someone with legal expertise or subject-matter knowledge, evaluates the facts and legal issues involved. They may provide feedback on the merits of each party’s case, suggest settlement ranges, and encourage parties to consider the risks and costs of litigation. The mediator’s goal is to help parties reach a settlement by providing a realistic assessment of their chances in court.
Key Characteristics:
-
Mediator’s Role: More active and advisory, providing legal analysis and recommendations.
-
Focus: Helping parties understand the legal strengths and weaknesses of their cases to facilitate settlement.
-
Process: Structured and sometimes more formal, with the mediator guiding negotiations toward a resolution.
-
Suitability: Common in commercial disputes, contract cases, or situations where parties have unrealistic expectations about their chances in court.
Benefits:
Evaluative mediation can be highly effective in breaking deadlocks when parties are entrenched in their positions or unaware of the legal realities. It can save time and money by encouraging settlements based on informed risk assessments.
3. Transformative Mediation
Transformative mediation shifts the focus from simply resolving the dispute to changing the way parties interact with each other. It emphasizes empowerment and recognition, aiming to improve communication, rebuild trust, and transform the relationship between the parties.
How Transformative Mediation Works:
In this approach, the mediator’s role is to support the parties in expressing their feelings, understanding each other’s perspectives, and gaining insight into the conflict’s deeper causes. The mediator intervenes minimally, allowing the parties to lead the process and discover their own solutions. The goal is not necessarily to reach a settlement quickly but to foster mutual respect and cooperation.
Key Characteristics:
-
Mediator’s Role: Facilitator of dialogue and emotional understanding, with minimal directive influence.
-
Focus: Empowering parties and encouraging mutual recognition to change the quality of their interaction.
-
Process: Less structured and more open-ended, allowing parties to explore underlying issues.
-
Suitability: Particularly useful in ongoing relationships, such as families, workplaces, or communities, where restoring trust and communication is crucial.
Benefits:
Transformative mediation can lead to profound changes in how parties relate to each other, reducing future conflicts and improving collaboration. It’s especially valuable when the parties must continue interacting after the dispute ends.
Choosing the Right Type of Mediation
Selecting the appropriate mediation style depends on the nature of the dispute, the relationship between the parties, and their goals for the process.
-
Facilitative mediation is ideal when parties want a collaborative process focused on mutual problem-solving and preserving relationships.
-
Evaluative mediation is best when legal issues dominate the dispute, and parties need a realistic assessment of their case’s strengths and weaknesses.
-
Transformative mediation suits conflicts where repairing or improving the relationship is as important as or more important than the immediate resolution.
Many mediators blend elements of these approaches to tailor the process to the parties’ needs. For example, a mediator might start with a facilitative style and incorporate evaluative feedback if negotiations stall.
Conclusion
Mediation offers a flexible and effective alternative to litigation, but not all mediation is the same. The three main types—facilitative, evaluative, and transformative—each serve different purposes and involve distinct mediator roles and techniques. Facilitative mediation emphasizes party empowerment and communication; evaluative mediation provides legal guidance and realistic assessments; transformative mediation focuses on relationship repair and mutual understanding. By understanding these types, parties can better choose the mediation approach that aligns with their dispute’s nature and their desired outcomes, increasing the likelihood of a successful resolution.
About The Author
